IAMBIGLOBAL BENCHMARK ATLASAtlas WILLIAM PLAYFAIR· LONDON 1786International Aesthetic Medicine
Benchmarking Institute
DE

EXPLORE IAMBI

Explore key pages

PageTop 250 worldwide · IAMBI Benchmark Atlas 2026PageThe institutePageResearch & perspectivesPageIAMBI Benchmark Atlas 2026PageSeven dimensions. A considered perspective.PageEight perspectives. A clearer comparison.PageOrganizations in perspective.PageOne ecosystem. Connected functions.
IAMBIGLOBAL BENCHMARK ATLASAtlas WILLIAM PLAYFAIR· LONDON 1786
THE GLOBAL ATLAS2026
30

Study markets. One perspective.

Worldwide
United States · 53 profilesUnited Kingdom · 32 profilesGermany · 21 profilesFrance · 14 profilesSwitzerland · 13 profilesUnited Arab Emirates · 8 profilesItaly · 8 profilesSpain · 7 profilesMonaco · 6 profilesTürkiye · 6 profilesCanada · 5 profilesIreland · 5 profilesAustria · 4 profilesBulgaria · 4 profilesNetherlands · 4 profilesPoland · 4 profilesBelgium · 3 profilesFinland · 3 profilesGreece · 3 profilesHungary · 3 profilesLuxembourg · 3 profilesPortugal · 3 profilesRomania · 3 profilesSweden · 3 profilesCzechia · 2 profilesDenmark · 2 profilesCroatia · 2 profilesEuropeNorth AmericaAsia

Drag to rotate · Pinch to zoom · Tap a country. Keyboard: arrow keys rotate, plus and minus zoom, Home resets.

The world of the Top 250

250 profiles
Explore all 250 profiles
Circle area = profiles per study marketAll markets
THE EDITION AT A GLANCE
250organizations
30study markets
8peer groups
7dimensions

01 — THE RESEARCH FIELD

One field. Eight perspectives.

From independent advisory to medical knowledge, the Atlas reveals the composition of an international field.

ORGANIZATIONS BY FUNCTIONn = 250
M2Ongoing medical care
7429.6 %
M7Continuing physician education
4518.0 %
M5Physician search & verification
4216.8 %
M4Second opinions & review
3413.6 %
M8Medical knowledge
228.8 %
M3Medical decision intelligence
166.4 %
M1Independent advisory
124.8 %
M6Medical student education
52.0 %
Number of profiles0 — 80

02 — EXPLORE THE DATA

Behind every rank is a profile.

Where do the results sit? How extensive is their evidence base? Select a peer group and explore both perspectives.

CSV
216 / 250

profiles with a numeric score

5.3 / 100

median assessment score

13.3 %

median evidence coverage

FIG. 01

Assessment meets evidence.

Each point represents an organization profile.

Evidence coverage (%)

0255075100051015202530Yestar Aesthetic Medical Group · M2 · Score 0.3 · evidence 1.3 %Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève · M4 · Score 0.3 · evidence 1.3 %AEMBA · M7 · Score 0.5 · evidence 1.9 %Dr Dębski Clinic · M2 · Score 0.6 · evidence 2.5 %Mylike Medical Aesthetic · M2 · Score 0.6 · evidence 2.5 %Doctify · M5 · Score 0.6 · evidence 2.5 %Clinic Hunter · M5 · Score 0.9 · evidence 3.8 %Wupdoc · M5 · Score 0.9 · evidence 3.8 %Institut Curie · M4 · Score 1.0 · evidence 3.9 %Amalieklinikken · M2 · Score 1.2 · evidence 5.0 %Aesthetics International · M2 · Score 1.2 · evidence 5.0 %Universidad Complutense de Madrid · M7 · Score 1.2 · evidence 4.6 %Cumulus Neuroscience · M3 · Score 1.5 · evidence 5.8 %Okadoc · M5 · Score 1.5 · evidence 6.2 %Poliklinika Bagatin · M2 · Score 1.6 · evidence 5.0 %Doctoranytime · M5 · Score 1.6 · evidence 6.3 %Champalimaud Foundation · M4 · Score 1.9 · evidence 7.5 %Inselspital Bern · M4 · Score 2.2 · evidence 9.0 %Clínica Universidad de Navarra · M4 · Score 2.2 · evidence 8.7 %Top Doctors · M5 · Score 2.2 · evidence 8.7 %M1 Kliniken / M1 Med Beauty · M2 · Score 2.4 · evidence 8.3 %Quirónsalud · M4 · Score 2.4 · evidence 6.7 %Caloo · M5 · Score 2.4 · evidence 7.0 %Japan Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · M8 · Score 2.4 · evidence 9.4 %River Medical · M2 · Score 2.5 · evidence 7.5 %CUF · M2 · Score 2.5 · evidence 6.3 %Novomed · M2 · Score 2.5 · evidence 8.8 %PlacidWay · M5 · Score 2.5 · evidence 10.0 %Memorial Healthcare Group · M2 · Score 2.6 · evidence 8.3 %Peking Union Medical College Plastic Surgery Hospital · M2 · Score 2.6 · evidence 9.0 %Foglaljorvost · M5 · Score 2.6 · evidence 7.9 %Hogrefe · M3 · Score 2.7 · evidence 10.8 %National Laser Institute · M7 · Score 2.7 · evidence 10.6 %ÖGPÄRC · M8 · Score 2.7 · evidence 8.2 %Aleris · M2 · Score 2.8 · evidence 10.0 %American Hospital Dubai · M2 · Score 2.8 · evidence 11.3 %Healix · M2 · Score 2.8 · evidence 9.8 %Hospital Clínic Barcelona · M4 · Score 2.8 · evidence 11.4 %Lanserhof Group · M2 · Score 2.9 · evidence 10.4 %Humanitas Research Hospital · M4 · Score 2.9 · evidence 8.3 %Superdoc · M5 · Score 2.9 · evidence 9.2 %Sollis Health · M2 · Score 3.0 · evidence 10.8 %Poliklinika Sinteza · M2 · Score 3.0 · evidence 9.5 %Dubai London Clinic · M2 · Score 3.0 · evidence 9.5 %Gustave Roussy · M4 · Score 3.0 · evidence 10.3 %Doctena · M5 · Score 3.0 · evidence 12.0 %VDÄPC · M8 · Score 3.0 · evidence 9.6 %CosmeSurge · M2 · Score 3.1 · evidence 8.8 %Clinique La Prairie · M2 · Score 3.1 · evidence 11.2 %TRIBEAU · M5 · Score 3.1 · evidence 10.0 %Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons · M8 · Score 3.1 · evidence 10.1 %Pihlajalinna · M2 · Score 3.2 · evidence 9.2 %Qunomedical · M5 · Score 3.2 · evidence 12.8 %Swiss Medical Aesthetics Academy · M7 · Score 3.2 · evidence 11.5 %Avoca Clinic · M2 · Score 3.3 · evidence 12.0 %Docbook · M5 · Score 3.3 · evidence 8.3 %Athens Beverly Hills Medical Group · M2 · Score 3.4 · evidence 12.5 %SOFCEP · M8 · Score 3.4 · evidence 12.5 %Clinique des Champs-Élysées · M2 · Score 3.5 · evidence 11.5 %Cosmetic Derma Medicine · M2 · Score 3.5 · evidence 9.5 %Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · M4 · Score 3.5 · evidence 10.4 %Medical Departures · M5 · Score 3.5 · evidence 14.2 %SICPRE · M8 · Score 3.5 · evidence 11.5 %IM2S Monaco · M2 · Score 3.6 · evidence 9.5 %NVPC · M8 · Score 3.6 · evidence 11.9 %ELSAN · M2 · Score 3.7 · evidence 11.2 %Akademikliniken · M2 · Score 3.8 · evidence 10.8 %Duna Medical Center · M2 · Score 3.8 · evidence 10.0 %SFME · M7 · Score 3.9 · evidence 13.1 %Turkish Society of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons · M8 · Score 3.9 · evidence 11.9 %proaesthetic Heidelberg · M2 · Score 4.0 · evidence 14.8 %Altoida · M3 · Score 4.0 · evidence 12.5 %Healthigo · M5 · Score 4.0 · evidence 11.5 %Anadolu Medical Center · M4 · Score 4.1 · evidence 14.4 %Doctolib · M5 · Score 4.1 · evidence 11.3 %Dr. Rose Private Hospital · M2 · Score 4.2 · evidence 13.3 %Haodf · M5 · Score 4.2 · evidence 12.0 %Zocdoc · M5 · Score 4.2 · evidence 14.2 %BAAPS · M8 · Score 4.2 · evidence 11.9 %Docplanner · M5 · Score 4.3 · evidence 10.3 %Florence Nightingale Hospitals · M2 · Score 4.4 · evidence 13.8 %Ramsay Santé · M2 · Score 4.4 · evidence 12.4 %VITA Hospital · M2 · Score 4.4 · evidence 13.7 %ColumbiaDoctors · M4 · Score 4.4 · evidence 11.3 %Multiesthetique · M5 · Score 4.4 · evidence 10.8 %Gangnam Unni / UNNI · M5 · Score 4.5 · evidence 12.9 %Booking Health · M5 · Score 4.5 · evidence 12.8 %Wellness Kliniek · M2 · Score 4.6 · evidence 13.3 %Swiss Medical Network · M2 · Score 4.7 · evidence 13.7 %Pearson Clinical · M3 · Score 4.7 · evidence 15.0 %So-Young · M5 · Score 4.7 · evidence 16.2 %IMCAS · M7 · Score 4.7 · evidence 14.0 %Perfect Clinic · M2 · Score 4.8 · evidence 13.3 %American Hospital of Paris · M4 · Score 4.8 · evidence 13.7 %SOFCPRE · M8 · Score 4.8 · evidence 14.4 %Kirei Pass · M5 · Score 4.9 · evidence 12.8 %Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons · M8 · Score 4.9 · evidence 14.5 %Private Medical · M1 · Score 5.0 · evidence 11.5 %Juneco · M2 · Score 5.0 · evidence 16.9 %Velthuis kliniek · M2 · Score 5.0 · evidence 13.8 %Save Face · M5 · Score 5.0 · evidence 12.4 %Allergan Medical Institute · M7 · Score 5.0 · evidence 16.1 %Kyoritsu Cosmetic Surgery · M2 · Score 5.1 · evidence 13.3 %Royal Belgian Society for Plastic Surgery · M8 · Score 5.1 · evidence 14.5 %BeauCare · M2 · Score 5.2 · evidence 14.5 %Liv Hospital · M2 · Score 5.2 · evidence 14.5 %Royal College of Surgeons of England – undergraduate education · M6 · Score 5.2 · evidence 15.0 %artis ACADEMY · M7 · Score 5.2 · evidence 14.6 %CeriX · M2 · Score 5.3 · evidence 15.0 %FlyMedi · M5 · Score 5.3 · evidence 14.8 %Healee · M5 · Score 5.4 · evidence 12.5 %MD² · M1 · Score 5.5 · evidence 13.3 %Bergman Clinics · M2 · Score 5.5 · evidence 14.5 %CogniFit · M3 · Score 5.5 · evidence 11.7 %Medexo · M4 · Score 5.5 · evidence 11.0 %AEDIT · M5 · Score 5.5 · evidence 12.9 %American Academy of Facial Esthetics (AAFE) · M7 · Score 5.5 · evidence 22.1 %EBSCO DynaMed · M8 · Score 5.5 · evidence 19.4 %DGPRÄC · M8 · Score 5.6 · evidence 16.1 %SIME · M7 · Score 5.7 · evidence 18.6 %UniversitätsSpital Zürich · M4 · Score 5.8 · evidence 12.6 %Modoodoc · M5 · Score 5.8 · evidence 13.7 %American Society of Plastic Surgeons · M8 · Score 5.8 · evidence 17.1 %Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners (JCCP) · M8 · Score 5.8 · evidence 12.6 %Takasu Clinic · M2 · Score 5.9 · evidence 13.8 %Galderma GAIN · M7 · Score 5.9 · evidence 16.7 %DGDC · M7 · Score 6.0 · evidence 16.5 %EuroMediCom / AMWC · M7 · Score 6.2 · evidence 15.5 %Mehiläinen · M2 · Score 6.4 · evidence 20.9 %Linus Health · M3 · Score 6.4 · evidence 19.6 %Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg · M4 · Score 6.4 · evidence 13.9 %ISAPS · M8 · Score 6.4 · evidence 17.8 %Rightway Healthcare · M1 · Score 6.5 · evidence 20.0 %Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · M4 · Score 6.6 · evidence 14.1 %Mayo Clinic Healthcare Second Opinion · M4 · Score 6.8 · evidence 16.9 %London Medical Concierge · M1 · Score 6.9 · evidence 19.2 %SCHUHFRIED · M3 · Score 6.9 · evidence 18.3 %MD Anderson Cancer Center · M4 · Score 7.0 · evidence 15.5 %SEME · M7 · Score 7.1 · evidence 19.6 %Mediglobus · M5 · Score 7.2 · evidence 18.7 %Cambridge Cognition · M3 · Score 7.3 · evidence 20.8 %Medigo · M4 · Score 7.3 · evidence 18.6 %HAPPYneuron · M3 · Score 7.4 · evidence 18.3 %Akademie für kosmetische Medizin Düsseldorf · M7 · Score 7.4 · evidence 17.7 %American Association of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery (AAAMS) · M7 · Score 7.4 · evidence 20.8 %Transcarent · M1 · Score 7.6 · evidence 19.4 %Johns Hopkins Medicine · M4 · Score 7.6 · evidence 16.8 %S-thetic · M2 · Score 7.7 · evidence 22.0 %CNS Vital Signs · M3 · Score 7.7 · evidence 17.1 %GAAPS · M5 · Score 7.8 · evidence 19.8 %The Aesthetic Immersion · M7 · Score 7.8 · evidence 25.0 %Included Health · M1 · Score 7.9 · evidence 20.2 %Hirslanden · M2 · Score 7.9 · evidence 23.5 %Canadian Board of Aesthetic Medicine (CBAM) · M7 · Score 8.0 · evidence 22.1 %Creyos · M3 · Score 8.4 · evidence 24.6 %American Academy of Aesthetic Medicine (AAAM) · M7 · Score 8.4 · evidence 25.0 %Rebecca Mackay Aesthetics Academy · M7 · Score 8.5 · evidence 24.5 %BMJ · M8 · Score 8.7 · evidence 20.8 %Medgate · M2 · Score 8.8 · evidence 19.6 %RealSelf · M5 · Score 8.9 · evidence 21.1 %UCL Surgical Society · M6 · Score 8.9 · evidence 22.8 %Swiss Society of Aesthetic Surgery Injection Academy · M7 · Score 8.9 · evidence 19.7 %Qynapse · M3 · Score 9.2 · evidence 21.7 %Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin · M4 · Score 9.2 · evidence 18.5 %Imperial College Plastic Surgery Society · M6 · Score 9.2 · evidence 24.0 %Penn Medicine · M4 · Score 9.3 · evidence 19.4 %PinnacleCare · M1 · Score 9.4 · evidence 24.6 %Accolade · M1 · Score 9.4 · evidence 22.7 %VIEW Plastic Surgery · M2 · Score 9.5 · evidence 21.5 %Derma Medical · M7 · Score 9.6 · evidence 21.1 %Mass General Brigham · M4 · Score 9.7 · evidence 19.4 %Stanford Health Care · M4 · Score 9.7 · evidence 21.3 %A.M.E. Accademia di Medicina Estetica · M7 · Score 9.7 · evidence 26.3 %Aesthetic Medical Educators Training · M7 · Score 10.0 · evidence 27.5 %BetterDoc · M5 · Score 10.1 · evidence 24.8 %Aurelia Institute · M7 · Score 10.1 · evidence 24.0 %MedAire · M2 · Score 10.2 · evidence 22.7 %International SOS · M2 · Score 10.5 · evidence 23.9 %Neurotrack · M3 · Score 10.7 · evidence 26.7 %Quantum Health · M1 · Score 11.0 · evidence 27.3 %WorldClinic · M1 · Score 11.1 · evidence 27.5 %Dr. Oberhofer Medical Aesthetics Academy · M7 · Score 11.1 · evidence 24.0 %Cognivue · M3 · Score 11.5 · evidence 24.2 %National Aesthetics Training Academy (NATA) · M7 · Score 11.5 · evidence 24.6 %BAPRAS · M6 · Score 11.6 · evidence 27.9 %Harley Academy · M7 · Score 11.8 · evidence 27.2 %MAP-IQ · M7 · Score 11.8 · evidence 24.3 %Bookimed · M5 · Score 11.9 · evidence 26.4 %Terveystalo · M2 · Score 12.0 · evidence 27.4 %Private Health Management · M1 · Score 12.1 · evidence 31.5 %Trusted Ones · M5 · Score 12.1 · evidence 31.0 %HPA Institute · M2 · Score 12.3 · evidence 28.5 %Facethetics · M7 · Score 12.6 · evidence 27.8 %UCSF Health · M4 · Score 12.9 · evidence 26.8 %Aesthetic Treatment Academy · M6 · Score 12.9 · evidence 36.0 %Istituto Europeo di Oncologia · M4 · Score 13.1 · evidence 28.0 %APT Injection Training · M7 · Score 13.2 · evidence 31.7 %International Association for Physicians in Aesthetic Medicine (IAPAM) · M7 · Score 13.2 · evidence 34.0 %Cochrane · M8 · Score 13.7 · evidence 29.3 %Cleveland Clinic · M4 · Score 13.9 · evidence 29.4 %BrainCheck · M3 · Score 14.1 · evidence 33.3 %CheckMyTreatment · M4 · Score 14.2 · evidence 24.0 %Cosmetic Courses · M7 · Score 14.3 · evidence 29.8 %AFMS School · M7 · Score 14.4 · evidence 29.4 %CDDI Group · M3 · Score 14.7 · evidence 34.2 %Empire Medical Training · M7 · Score 14.7 · evidence 38.4 %UHNW Aesthetics · M1 · Score 15.1 · evidence 36.0 %European College of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery (ECAMS) · M7 · Score 16.1 · evidence 33.4 %DGBT · M7 · Score 16.1 · evidence 34.8 %Derma Institute · M7 · Score 16.4 · evidence 32.3 %Interface Aesthetics · M7 · Score 17.1 · evidence 36.3 %Queen Mary University of London – Aesthetic Medicine · M7 · Score 17.7 · evidence 40.0 %Acquisition Aesthetics · M7 · Score 19.7 · evidence 39.9 %University of Manchester · M7 · Score 20.9 · evidence 43.6 %University of South Wales / Learna · M7 · Score 21.5 · evidence 46.1 %Master Class Aesthetics · M7 · Score 25.0 · evidence 32.0 %

Score · Assessment scale 0–100View 0–30

Select a data point to explore its organization, rank and values.

FIG. 02

Where the results sit.

Number of profiles in each score range.

Score ranges · Points out of 100

OBSERVED RANGE0.3—25.0

Full Atlas selection

M1 · Independent advisoryM2 · Ongoing medical careM3 · Medical decision intelligenceM4 · Second opinions & reviewM5 · Physician search & verificationM6 · Medical student educationM7 · Continuing physician educationM8 · Medical knowledge

Basis: 216 numerically assessed profiles · 34 NR. Evidence median: all 250 profiles. Score intervals exclude their upper bound; the final interval includes it.

Methodology & sources

03 — DISCOVER ORGANIZATIONS

Leading their peer group.

All 250 profiles
M1

UHNW Aesthetics

Independent Advisory & Governance

15.1Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M1
M2

HPA Institute

Longitudinal Governance & Safety

12.3Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M2
M3

CDDI Group

Medical Decision Intelligence

14.7Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M3
M4

CheckMyTreatment

Second Opinion & Treatment Review

14.2Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M4
M5

Trusted Ones

Doctor Verification & Patient Matching

12.1Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M5
M6

Aesthetic Treatment Academy

Medical Student Education

12.9Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M6
M7

Master Class Aesthetics

Physician Aesthetic Education

25.0Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M7
M8

Cochrane

Medical Information & Knowledge

13.7Score / 100Segment rank 1 · M8

04 — RESEARCH FRAMEWORK

Comparison on a clear foundation.

Understand the methodology
01

A shared purpose.

Eight peer groups organize institutions by function. Rank positions are established within each respective group.

02

A clear assessment.

The 0–100 scale makes the assessment readable. Distributions and individual profiles place the result in context.

03

Visible evidence.

A separate percentage describes the recorded evidence base. Result sources and assessment logic remain directly accessible.

Data basis · IAMBI Benchmark 2026

IAMBI Benchmark 2026 scores represent calculated criteria values. The Atlas presents the transmitted results and their associated evidence coverage consistently across profiles, rankings, charts and data exports. The methodology explains criteria, evidence and peer groups.

Methodology & sources
THE ATLAS IDEA1786WILLIAM PLAYFAIR · LONDON

AN IDEA THAT LIVES ON

Making knowledge visible. Worldwide today.

William Playfair’s Atlas turned numbers into images. IAMBI brings this idea to aesthetic medicine: connecting data, understanding differences and opening new perspectives.

The story behind the idea